Lex Politico

Texas and Federal Political Law and Litigation

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • About

Chief of Staff to Texas Lawmaker Indicted on 11 Ethics Charges

Travel reimbursements are back in the news in Texas.  See the Statesman story here.

Share this:

  • Share
This entry was posted in Texas campaign finance, travel reimbursements and tagged travel reimbursements on April 15, 2013 by admin.

Post navigation

← Texas House: Elections Committee to Consider Several Bills Monday SB 346 Violates the First Amendment and Favors Labor →

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,018 other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • San Antonio Appellate Court to Decide Important Case Documenting Systematic Manipulation of Assisted Voters and Indications of Ballot Box Stuffing
  • Location changed for discovery hearing today in Noteware v. Turner pension bond case
  • Hearing Wednesday June 13: District Court to Decide City of Houston’s Attempt to Prohibit Testimony in Suit Challenging Billion Dollar Pension Bond Deal
  • Texas Prop 4 and Separation of Powers
  • Zimmerman Exonerated as TEC Drops Inquiry Based on Politically-Motivated 2015 Complaint; Decision is Important Victory Recognizing Candidates’ Ability to Trace Funds in Accounts

Recent Comments

  • SB 346 Approved by State Affairs | Lex Politico on SB 346 Violates the First Amendment and Favors Labor
  • Campaigns & Elections Mag: “Text donations spread down ballot” | Lex Politico on “Dispelling the notion that text-to-donate is the exclusive realm of Democrats”
  • TEC Vote Today: Will They Allow Text Msg Contributions? | Lex Politico on TEC to Consider Request to Allow Contributions to Texas Candidates and PACs Via Text Msg
  • Texas Ethics Commission Likely to Vote On Text Message Contribution Request Jan 31 | Lex Politico on TEC to Consider Request to Allow Contributions to Texas Candidates and PACs Via Text Msg

Archives

  • August 2018
  • June 2018
  • November 2017
  • June 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • October 2016
  • November 2015
  • July 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013

Categories

  • abuse of office
  • aggregate limits
  • ballot access
  • campaign finance
  • Catholic Leadership v Reisman
  • corporate contributions
  • corporate speech
  • deregulation
  • discrimination
  • Early to Rise
  • ecuador
  • election fraud
  • Empower Texans v TEC
  • free speech around the wold
  • Hotze v Sebelius
  • Houston campaign and election law
  • Houston ERO referendum 2014
  • impeachment
  • initiatives and referenda
  • IRS
  • Lopez v Rivera
  • McCutcheon v FEC
  • nonprofit
  • Noteware v Turner
  • Palmas v Sanchez
  • politiqueras
  • prior restraints
  • public financing
  • residency
  • resign to run
  • Rio Grande Valley corruption
  • SB 219
  • SB 346
  • separation of powers
  • snowden
  • tax policy
  • TEC advisory opinions
  • Texas campaign finance
  • Texas constitutional law
  • Texas election contests
  • Texas election law
  • Texas government
  • Texas legislature
  • Texas lobby law
  • Texas municipal elections
  • Texas petitions
  • Texas recalls
  • text contributions
  • travel reimbursements
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Recently Tweeted

Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

Proudly powered by WordPress